<div dir="ltr">That's very sad to hear David.<br><br>I believe that the opposite it true, Coova took on itself to continue the development<br>of the chillispot captive portal software and doing a wonderful job at it by maintaining<br>
good interaction with the open source community.<br><br>I don't know what kind of management orientation is handled in wikipedia but<br>I'm pretty sure it's possible to contact a higher hierarchy than the page owner<br>
or such. I suggest you do that.<br><br><br>Regards,<br>Liran. <br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:13 AM, David Bird <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david@coova.com">david@coova.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I recently noticed that someone removed the link to <a href="http://www.coova.org" target="_blank">www.coova.org</a> from<br>
the wikipedia page for Chillispot. The person left a notice on the<br>
discussion stating "CoovaChilli needs to stop hijacking this page for<br>
commercial gain". This has me very confused... as the page in question<br>
is becoming nothing but a page for "commercial" links. Indeed, the link<br>
to CoovaChilli is almost the only useful link on the page (if you are<br>
looking for Chillispot functionality). Yet, this is the only link<br>
removed. Of course, this person, no doubt, likely has their own<br>
commercial interests... or is completely clueless. But still has me<br>
wondering..<br>
<br>
Is Coova "too commercial"? If so, how?<br>
<br>
What do you think?<br>
<br>
David<br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>-- <br>Sincerely, Liran Tal<br><br>Founder and CTO<br>Linux and Open Source<br>Enginx - <a href="http://enginx.com">http://enginx.com</a><br>
</div>